Javascript Menu by Deluxe-Menu.com

  Marketplace & Forum

Subscribe 
Search

Go Back   The Purse Page Marketplace & Forum > Fashion & Handbag Chat > Open Handbag and Fashion Discussion
User Name
Password

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 01-18-2007, 02:59 AM
Designer Ella's Avatar
Junior Member

 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Boston, MA / might move to Boca area FL.
Posts: 17
Default What do YOU consider "Not Designer"?

This is just an interesting question, and I don't want to insult.

I consider Coach, Dooney and Juicy to be designer.

But not Baby Phat or BCBG Max Azria or Bebe (hey I can afford Bebe lol). (I'm not sure if anyone considers bebe designer, but I don't.)
__________________
If I were a Louis Vuitton, my # would be 8110.

Loves: Coach, Marc Jacobs, Chloe', Louis Vuitton, Dior
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 01-18-2007, 03:14 PM
Member

 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 86
Default

I dont consider BeBe designer either, to me they're about 2 steps above Target. Baby Phat maybe 1 step above Target.
For me it's about the cut, the style, the quality and the legacy. When you can look at a garment and say Thats Chloe because you recognize the style. When it's generic looking and not interesting to look at, that to me isn't designer.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 01-19-2007, 11:21 PM
Designer Ella's Avatar
Junior Member

 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Boston, MA / might move to Boca area FL.
Posts: 17
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ang_J
I dont consider BeBe designer either, to me they're about 2 steps above Target. Baby Phat maybe 1 step above Target.
For me it's about the cut, the style, the quality and the legacy. When you can look at a garment and say Thats Chloe because you recognize the style. When it's generic looking and not interesting to look at, that to me isn't designer.
LOL!

I agree. Designer clothes should be detailed and unique (never something one can get anywhere, but more expensive), and bags should have some class (even if a bit kitsch to some people) and stand out. I don't consider any brand that really copies to be designer, like the two bags by BCBG Max Azria I liked, and later didn't, were actually copies of Paddingtons, but no lock. Heh.

I think Baby Phat is probably more luxury for urban style. It's too "every person" and accessible, but for a certain type of person.

Now what about Marc by Marc Jacobs? I'm torn because it's Marc Jacobs, sort of, and I've liked at least one bag, but mostly the bags are simple and not luxuriously made. On the other hand I do like the clothes, and the clothes aren't cheap. I think the clothes follow behind the main line MUCH more than the bags, but of course the bags can't, unfortunately, look like MJ.
__________________
If I were a Louis Vuitton, my # would be 8110.

Loves: Coach, Marc Jacobs, Chloe', Louis Vuitton, Dior
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 01-22-2007, 08:02 AM
kitsch_k's Avatar
Senior Member

 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,914
Default

well i think the brands that aren't exactly designer are the ones which retail for less than a hundreD?? like gap and so on....
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:42 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.5.2